StudyDesign 01416
StudyDesign 01416
@research-01416

StudyDesign 01416 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-31183

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 46 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-30617

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 4 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer add...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-28636

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-27734

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-26710

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25600

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 27 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-22645

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-21554

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Create separate columns for the quantity measured,…” as ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20280

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 15 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 32 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain ...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2