StudyDesign 01376
StudyDesign 01376
@research-01376

StudyDesign 01376 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 29
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-31182

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 46 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log that survives the next ar...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-30615

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30184

Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exerc...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-29594

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-28631

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-27725

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-26701

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-25594

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 22 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the c...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22634

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-21547

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20267

Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 9 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 26 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2