EvidenceTable 01334
EvidenceTable 01334
@research-01334

EvidenceTable 01334 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-27714

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-26688

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-25579

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 16 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-22621

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-21535

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20267

Case 25 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether ass...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 20 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16822

Case 14 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 7 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identify...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 17 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-13278

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-11929

Case 5 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2