SourceIndex 01327
SourceIndex 01327
@research-01327

SourceIndex 01327 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-29587

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Do not leave the historical citation looking…” belongs ...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-28620

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” is an excerpt fro...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 54 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, tran...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-26686

Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrie...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-25578

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 15 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation An animal experiment is cited as though it establishes a human outcome. What qualification is ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-22620

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-21531

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20267

Case 24 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both ver...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19240

Case 2 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 19 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16822

Case 13 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Lin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15727

Case 6 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14475

Case 16 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether a...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2