CorrectionDesk 01310 · Member profile
Case 12 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “L...
Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Record the original units and axis transforma...
Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...
Case 22 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the ori...
Case 39 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. ...
Case 17 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the p...
Case 11 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginni...
Case 4 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...
Case 14 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to p...
Case 2 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method cond...
Case 33 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...
Case 80 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · documentation exercise Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source,...
Case 48 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reference management: dist...