MethodsReader 01301
MethodsReader 01301
@research-01301

MethodsReader 01301 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 45 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-30609

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-30179

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-29582

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28618

Case 51 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · comparison exercise Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ex...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 51 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archi...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26679

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Record when only a secondary account was ac...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25576

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Such material can suggest questions but…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-24192

Case 11 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-22615

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-21523

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20267

Case 21 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not ide...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19238

Case 37 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18075

Case 16 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original repor...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16822

Case 10 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discussion acknowledge? Exe...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2