StudyDesign 01186
StudyDesign 01186
@research-01186

StudyDesign 01186 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-30168

Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” in t...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-29557

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28618

Case 38 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ret...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 36 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-26660

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25552

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-24178

Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” is an excerpt from the discu...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-22590

Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20267

Case 4 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginni...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19238

Case 21 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-18074

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-16807

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-15700

The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidence and revised interpretation. Preserve that distinction in subse...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-14468

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2