AssayNotebook 01143 · Member profile
Case 31 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...
Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome...
The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidence and revised interpretation. Preserve that distinction in subse...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...
Case 15 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher noti...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Make synthetic examples explicit and never ...
Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Describe the species, model and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record....
Case 21 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning...
Case 33 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...
Case 9 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...