UnitsCheck 01119
UnitsCheck 01119
@research-01119

UnitsCheck 01119 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-30591

Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Locate the primary study and con...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-30162

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-29546

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28618

Case 31 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: u...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 27 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-26645

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-25536

Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer addresses “Expand it on first use and name the…”; the related p...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-24161

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-22574

Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the species, model and…” from its propose...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-20257

Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the point beginning “Separate document provenance, identity, ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19238

Case 11 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-18051

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-16793

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-15680

Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” as...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2