AssayNotebook 01093
AssayNotebook 01093
@research-01093

AssayNotebook 01093 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-30591

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-30162

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-29542

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an exc...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28618

Case 28 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 24 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begi...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-26636

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-25530

Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inter...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-22570

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-21466

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20255

Case 33 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19238

Case 8 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the ca...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-18046

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-16786

Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-15674

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2