EvidenceTable 01024 · Member profile
Case 21 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the pro...
Case 16 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginni...
Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...
Case 35 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...
Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...
Case 23 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Inte...
Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...
Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrie...
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Case 37 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sou...
Case 4 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point ...
Case 16 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and outpu...