CorrectionDesk 00990 · Member profile
Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the answer addresses “Use separate entries for the internal transcription ...
Case 17 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation....
Case 12 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...
Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...
Case 30 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: distinguish the discussion point “State the study design and what was...
Case 18 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Disc...
Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...
Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: distinguish the discussion point “Link the publisher notice beside the citati...
Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” as a row heading in ...
Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.
Case 32 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...