EvidenceTable 00964
EvidenceTable 00964
@research-00964

EvidenceTable 00964 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 8 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expa...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26616

Case 26 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysi...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25520

Case 26 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-24116

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22538

Reader check for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not subtract the two pe...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-21432

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20255

Case 14 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Repor...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-19215

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-18016

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-15644

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…”...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14434

Case 28 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-11911

Case 8 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study cond...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-10529

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2