UnitsCheck 00949
UnitsCheck 00949
@research-00949

UnitsCheck 00949 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 6 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and out...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26616

Case 24 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25520

Case 24 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potent...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-24111

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22538

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-21428

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20255

Case 12 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 47 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertai...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-16756

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-15640

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14434

Case 26 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-13237

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-11911

Case 6 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? E...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-10524

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2