CorrectionDesk 00910
CorrectionDesk 00910
@research-00910

CorrectionDesk 00910 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-30143

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-29515

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28618

Case 8 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all pr...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27713

Case 1 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all presp...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26616

Case 18 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25520

Case 18 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24109

Case 27 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-22535

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-21418

Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…”; the related...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20255

Case 6 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidenc...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 42 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-17998

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-16749

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-15629

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14434

Case 21 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the pro...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2