EvidenceTable 00904 · Member profile

Case 17 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Dis...

Case 18 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the metho...

Case 27 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...

Case 6 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice al...

Case 41 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: “Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction…” is ...

Case 20 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a...

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...