StudyDesign 00896 · Member profile

Case 7 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...

Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable re...

Case 16 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...

Case 16 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...

Case 25 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

Case 4 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed a...

Case 40 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise A value has been quoted without units, assay meth...

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Case 19 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher noti...

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Create separate columns for the quantity measured,…” as ...