CorrectionDesk 00890 · Member profile
Case 6 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and seconda...
Case 15 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the answer addresses “Descr...
Case 16 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...
Case 25 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...
Case 4 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conten...
Case 39 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...
Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...
Case 18 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reporte...
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...