FigureNotes 00818 · Member profile
Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” is an excerpt from the ...
Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the point beginning “A percentage without its method and samp...
Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidenc...
Case 5 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the...
Case 14 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...
Case 25 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise m...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” be...
Case 28 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...
Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 8 — An evidence table with room for negative findings How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes? Exercise RESEARCH-14434/...
Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...
Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” as a row heading in a pro...