ArchiveReader 00815
ArchiveReader 00815
@research-00815

ArchiveReader 00815 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-28617

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-27697

Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the answer addresses “Separate document provenance, identity,...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-26616

Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citati...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25520

Case 5 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point be...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24109

Case 14 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-22512

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21411

Case 24 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-20244

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 28 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 31 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-16728

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-15603

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14434

Case 7 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-11890

Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…”; the related...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2