StudyDesign 00786 · Member profile
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...
Case 56 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · comparison exercise Correction note for “A correction log that survives the next ar...
Case 1 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expa...
Case 1 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and reta...
Case 10 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exc...
Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” belongs to t...
Case 20 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...
Case 24 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origi...
Case 27 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...
Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...
Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Describe the measurement, population ...
Case 3 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report ef...
Reader check for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: distinguish the discussion point “Put the species or model, design,...