CitationNotes 00782 · Member profile
The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Case 56 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · comparison exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A la...
Case 1 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archiv...
Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...
Case 9 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measur...
Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” is an excer...
Case 19 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...
Case 23 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain th...
Case 26 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative...
Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Case 2 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answ...