EvidenceTable 00774
EvidenceTable 00774
@research-00774

EvidenceTable 00774 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-31170

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inte...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 34 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 34 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysi...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-30122

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-29496

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-28608

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27693

Case 55 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-25517

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condit...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24109

Case 8 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whe...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-22504

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21411

Case 18 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-20238

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 22 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “L...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 25 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: u...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2