CorrectionDesk 00740
CorrectionDesk 00740
@research-00740

CorrectionDesk 00740 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 34 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 33 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-30119

Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who…” is an excerpt from...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27693

Case 50 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-25509

Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24109

Case 3 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and seconda...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21411

Case 13 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-20229

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 17 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 20 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-16714

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2