UnitsCheck 00739 · Member profile
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Case 143 — A correction log for an archive article · correction exercise Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addre...
Case 50 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source,...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...
Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: retain the wording beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs along...
Case 3 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sour...
Case 13 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...
Case 17 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...
Case 20 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the poi...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “Retain units, method, laborator...
Case 51 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · comparison exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the...