StudyDesign 00736 · Member profile

Case 143 — A correction log for an archive article · correction exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep the c...

Case 50 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, tran...

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the ev...

Case 3 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the ev...

Case 13 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

Case 17 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the pro...

Case 19 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both ver...

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection c...

Case 50 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish p...

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...