ArchiveReader 00725 · Member profile

Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…”; the relate...

Case 142 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · correction exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertai...

Case 48 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the la...

Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions wit...

Case 1 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the c...

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

Case 11 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identif...

Case 15 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Re...

Case 18 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “...

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer different questions. Record the report’s own definition and units before comparing ...

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...