AssayNotebook 00723 · Member profile
Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...
Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...
Case 142 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · correction exercise Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty e...
Case 48 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...
Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...
Case 1 — A correction log for an archive article Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...
Case 11 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...
Case 15 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source refere...
Case 18 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...
Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...