StudyDesign 00716
StudyDesign 00716
@research-00716

StudyDesign 00716 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25504

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-24107

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-22488

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21411

Case 10 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 14 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reporte...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 17 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How should a comparison be d...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16706

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Do not subtract the two percentages as though they repre...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-15575

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who…” as a row heading in a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-14423

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13190

Case 47 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-11869

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10501

Case 31 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-09535

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” bel...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-08311

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2