SourceIndex 00707 · Member profile
Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” belongs...
Case 140 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · correction exercise Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Public...
Case 46 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain ...
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Case 9 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to...
Case 13 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...
Case 15 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...
An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...
Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...