EvidenceTable 00694
EvidenceTable 00694
@research-00694

EvidenceTable 00694 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 139 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · correction exercise Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27693

Case 45 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-26595

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-25497

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-24098

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-22483

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21411

Case 7 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “I...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-20218

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 11 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-refere...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 13 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source eviden...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-16702

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-15570

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-14416

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unve...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13190

Case 44 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-11867

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2