CorrectionDesk 00680
CorrectionDesk 00680
@research-00680

CorrectionDesk 00680 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 31 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-30114

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-29478

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid ...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 137 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · correction exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the an...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27693

Case 43 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reference management: disting...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-26590

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an exc...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-25493

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-24093

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-22479

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21411

Case 5 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sa...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 9 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or excl...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-16698

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2