UnitsCheck 00659
UnitsCheck 00659
@research-00659

UnitsCheck 00659 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-26584

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-25488

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-24089

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-22477

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21411

Case 2 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source referen...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-20206

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an exc...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 6 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 8 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-16696

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-15559

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-14411

Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “List materials, measurement conditions, ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13190

Case 39 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-11861

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10501

Case 23 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducibl...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2