StudyDesign 00656
StudyDesign 00656
@research-00656

StudyDesign 00656 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-31169

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30919

Case 32 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”:...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 30 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell th...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-30112

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unve...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-29476

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 135 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · correction exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27693

Case 40 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26583

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-25488

Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer addresses “Expand it on first use and name the…”; the related p...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-24088

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-22476

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21411

Case 1 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, methods...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-20206

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 5 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 8 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2