CorrectionDesk 00650 · Member profile
Case 134 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · correction exercise Method note for “A correction log that survives the next archi...
Case 39 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...
Case 36 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: wh...
Case 50 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-...
Case 1 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model o...
Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...
Case 4 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses...
Case 7 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and out...
Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the answer addresses “Describe the species, model and…”; the related point is “Diff...
Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating…” i...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 38 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading a preclinical paper...
If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.