FigureNotes 00648 · Member profile
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...
Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...
Case 134 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · correction exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next arc...
Case 39 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...
Case 36 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysi...
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Case 50 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-metho...
Case 4 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all pr...
Case 7 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output t...
Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Describe the species, model and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an i...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid ...
Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...