AssayNotebook 00643 · Member profile
Case 29 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the la...
Case 133 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · correction exercise Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what...
Case 39 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...
Case 35 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...
Case 49 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link bo...
Case 54 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference rang...
Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” is an excer...
Case 3 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Disc...
Case 6 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measur...
Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...