CitationNotes 00642 · Member profile

Case 133 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · correction exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading a preclinical paper: w...

Case 39 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...

Case 35 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambigu...

Case 49 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both ...

Case 54 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · comparison exercise Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: wha...

Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...

Case 3 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begin...

Case 6 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: us...

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

Case 37 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Method note for “Two laboratories, two perce...