CorrectionDesk 00640
CorrectionDesk 00640
@research-00640

CorrectionDesk 00640 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-30111

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-29473

Even an authentic analytical report has scope limits. It is not by itself a demonstration of clinical efficacy, sterility or suitability for human use...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 133 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · correction exercise Method note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what bel...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27693

Case 38 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguis...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26582

Case 35 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-25484

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-24083

Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions wit...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22474

Case 49 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21408

Case 54 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · comparison exercise A value has been quoted without units, assay method o...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-20202

Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19214

Case 3 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to po...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17968

Case 6 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Inter...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-16692

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-14407

Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” in the r...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2