CorrectionDesk 00630 · Member profile
Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the answer addresses “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation...
Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...
Case 132 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · correction exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percen...
Case 37 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...
Case 34 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...
Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State whether it was prespecified and how…” is an excerpt from the di...
Case 47 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparis...
Case 52 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what ...
Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...
Case 2 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the ev...
Case 4 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the w...
Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: retain the wording beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory...
Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from it...