StudyDesign 00526
StudyDesign 00526
@research-00526

StudyDesign 00526 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-30107

Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…” is an excerpt...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 46 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguis...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 121 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27693

Case 24 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State wh...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26582

Case 19 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-25453

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22474

Case 32 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21408

Case 37 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-20178

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19213

Case 29 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-17948

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-16666

Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” is an excerpt from the discu...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15544

Case 25 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14402

Case 35 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2