StudyDesign 00486
StudyDesign 00486
@research-00486

StudyDesign 00486 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 24 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-30104

Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Record the original units and axis transformat...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 43 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reference management: dist...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 117 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · uncertainty exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-met...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-27693

Case 19 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26582

Case 14 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-25441

Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the answer addresses “Separate document provenance, identity,...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-24041

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22474

Case 27 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21408

Case 32 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 41 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A literature note that separates hy...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19213

Case 24 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-17934

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-16654

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15544

Case 20 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail t...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2