UnitsCheck 00479
UnitsCheck 00479
@research-00479

UnitsCheck 00479 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-25441

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-24039

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22474

Case 26 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21408

Case 31 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 40 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19213

Case 23 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail t...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-17932

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16652

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15544

Case 19 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication sta...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14402

Case 29 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13190

Case 14 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-11817

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10500

Case 47 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-09471

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-08265

Case 40 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambigu...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2