CorrectionDesk 00380 · Member profile
Case 35 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...
Case 105 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · uncertainty exercise Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distingu...
Case 6 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method cond...
Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…”; the related ...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Case 37 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...
Case 11 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...
Case 16 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...
Case 26 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...
Case 9 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the ca...
Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation;...
Case 5 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? E...
Case 15 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations b...