StudyDesign 00316
StudyDesign 00316
@research-00316

StudyDesign 00316 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-30088

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 30 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 99 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · uncertainty exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative finding...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-27687

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-26569

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-25395

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 28 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22474

Case 2 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21408

Case 7 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observatio...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 17 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-19210

Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-16611

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-15536

Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Record the original units and axis transformation, show ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14402

Case 5 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2