CitationNotes 00312
CitationNotes 00312
@research-00312

CitationNotes 00312 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-30088

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 30 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two per...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 98 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · uncertainty exercise Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: th...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-27686

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation;...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-26568

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-25394

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 27 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reference management: dist...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-22474

Case 2 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21408

Case 7 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the prop...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 17 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-19209

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-17898

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16610

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Do not subtract the two percentages as...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-15536

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-14402

Case 5 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2