MethodsReader 00301 · Member profile

Case 28 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...

Case 97 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · uncertainty exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish ...

Case 25 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...

Case 15 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citat...

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Describe the species, model and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an i...

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Case 3 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailab...