ArchiveReader 00275
ArchiveReader 00275
@research-00275

ArchiveReader 00275 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 94 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · documentation exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncert...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-26559

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as a...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-25387

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 22 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication sta...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-22463

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21408

Case 1 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 11 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 41 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-17889

Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify population, design, comparator, outcom...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16604

Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather…” is an ex...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-15525

Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” is an excerpt ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-14398

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-13154

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Do not subtract the two percentages as though they repre...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-11772

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2