MethodsReader 00221
MethodsReader 00221
@research-00221

MethodsReader 00221 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30568

Case 16 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-30078

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 23 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond? Exercise R...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 89 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · documentation exercise Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “A...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-26548

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-25371

Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. A review article can help locate sources, but it is not a substitute for...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 14 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation....

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 29 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertai...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-21399

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 4 — An evidence table with room for negative findings How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes? Exercise RESEARCH-20174/...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 33 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent compa...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-17883

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-16587

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-15516

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2