CorrectionDesk 00210
CorrectionDesk 00210
@research-00210

CorrectionDesk 00210 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-30078

Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29469

Case 22 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original repor...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28599

Case 88 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · documentation exercise A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-27667

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-26545

Correction note for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: retain the wording beginning “Separate document provenance,...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-25369

A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer different questions. Record the report’s own definition and units before comparing ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24037

Case 12 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answe...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-22448

Case 28 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-21396

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20174

Case 2 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sour...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-19200

Case 31 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A literature note that separates hy...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17881

Case 36 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-16582

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-15512

Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Do not compare apparent visual distances…”; the related ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14395

Case 23 — An evidence table with room for negative findings How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes? Exercise RESEARCH-14395...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2